Horton, Hears a Who by Dr. Seuss
The first book/movie I compared is Horton, Hears a Who by Dr. Seuss. This classic tale was lived up to nicely in the movie adaptation. The movie does an excellent job of following the storyline of the book, while adding details in areas of the book left vague. For example, the book focuses on Horton as the main character, whereas the movie depicts both Horton and the Who-Ville Mayor as main characters. A few other important differences from the book and movie, included the movies introduction and expansion of roles for several characters, including Horton’s friends and enemies and other Who’s from Who-Ville.
In some ways, I believe I connected more with the movie version than the book because of the expansion of the sub-characters. Compared to the book, I felt the movie was more dimensional and in depth. Giving names and stories of the characters in WhoVille allowed me to connect with the characters more than the book alone.
In comparison, I would look at a movie such as Cat and The Hat, which is based upon the book by Dr. Seuss. That movie did not live up to what I thought derived in the book version. The movie felt like it was focused more on pure entertainment and took many expansions and turns away from the book to make it a good adaptation of the original.
Charlotte's Web by E.B. White
This classic tale was delightfully retold on the big screen in 2006 in the movie adaption. The movie, like the book, tells the story of a friendship between Charlotte, the spider, and Wilbur, the pig. The movie adaption sticks closely to the original text in this telling and does a remarkable job of depicting the talking animals with realistic animation. I found this adaptation of the book quite charming and far more realistic than earlier animated versions of the book. Watching this movie with my children, I was taken back to the first time I read the book as a child. I fell in love with Wilbur and Charlotte and their unique bond of friendship. My children loved it equally as well, even to the point of crying at the end when I had to explain over and over again, why Charlotte died.
What makes Charlotte's Web such a classic tale is that it is timeless in nature. The story of friendship is as true today as it was when first published in 1952. While some of the smaller details depict an era from long ago, the central theme of friendship, loyalty, and companionship remains constant.
Charlotte's Web by E.B. White
This classic tale was delightfully retold on the big screen in 2006 in the movie adaption. The movie, like the book, tells the story of a friendship between Charlotte, the spider, and Wilbur, the pig. The movie adaption sticks closely to the original text in this telling and does a remarkable job of depicting the talking animals with realistic animation. I found this adaptation of the book quite charming and far more realistic than earlier animated versions of the book. Watching this movie with my children, I was taken back to the first time I read the book as a child. I fell in love with Wilbur and Charlotte and their unique bond of friendship. My children loved it equally as well, even to the point of crying at the end when I had to explain over and over again, why Charlotte died.
What makes Charlotte's Web such a classic tale is that it is timeless in nature. The story of friendship is as true today as it was when first published in 1952. While some of the smaller details depict an era from long ago, the central theme of friendship, loyalty, and companionship remains constant.
I remember reading this book as a child and immediately falling in love with the fantasy world of Narnia. It is a book that I read over and over again through my adolescence and each time I found new insights and meanings that I had not found before. Even as an adult, reading the book provided a new level of understanding, particularly in the correlations between the story of Narnia and the Christian beliefs of Jesus and the story of his resurrection as told in the Bible. When the movie came out, I hesitated on the decision of whether or not to watch the movie, mainly because the images and the feelings those images produced in my mind from the words of the book, had created such a complete picture of Narnia and the characters, that I was afraid the movie would change that imagery in my mind. But after some time, I went ahead and watched the movie and was relieved that the movie did an excellent job of playing out the very images that I had created in my mind. The movie lived up to both the story and the fantasy world created by C.S.Lewis. Following very closely with the book, the movie chronicles the story of four children, Peter, Edmund, Susan and Lucy, who discover the world of Narnia through a secret entrance hidden inside a wardrobe. Without being overly critical, there were very few discrepancies between the book and the movie. In the movie, the insertion of digitally enhanced characters to create the fictional characters such as Aslan, Tumnus, Mr and Mrs. Beaver, were not only realistic but very believable.
Compared to other fantasy type books for children, such as books like the Harry Potter series, I never felt the connection like I did with the Narnia series. While good, the Harry Potter books don’t seem to have the levels of meaning intertwined in them like The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe. It’s the connection and complex levels of a book that captivate my imagination and interest.